Is it really gamers' fault for being upset by the
diablo immortal gold statement? Are they only"qualified players" once again, since they were decried through the Mass Effect 3 controversy and countless others? Or are they entitled to a bit mad when they're let down from the companies whose games they support and purchase? All things considered, without consumers there is a company dead in the water. The media and game publishers overlook this.
Imagine visiting a restaurant that's been hyping this amazing steak dinner. Everyone is excited for this particular dinner but when they get there, the waiter tells them sorry we don't have steak but it's still going to be a great dinner, only wait and watch. Then they bring out steamed veggies.The customers are upset. They expected steak, and if not beef they expected a meal and all they're given is steamed veggies. "Is this a joke?" one asks.
Now imagine these clients are told they're exhibiting signs of"poisonous masculinity" and they're just"qualified" crybabies who need to shut up and return home. The restaurant has every right to
buy diablo immortal gold create steamed vegetables and if they're just individual , down the road they will also have steak. Headlines make much ado over these entitled restaurant goers who can't just shut up and eat their broccoli.I'm sorry but if that sounds crazy for you, welcome into the gaming industry where we are routinely given broccoli and advised to chew, claims of beef be damned.
